🔗 Share this article

Iturns out the manager was able to withstand losing against Grimsby. He weathered an important European final versus one of the worst Spurs sides for many years. He could survive home defeats against West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, laying waste to the team's best homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling the squad the worst in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed one adversary with whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to engage. You come at the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, like many a top-flight right-back during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, Amorim took on Jason Wilcox and seems to have missed. The most distracted of readers will notice the paradoxical situation: a coach who often railed his squad for losing individual battles crumbling in the face of the intense pressure and animal charisma of a the Premier League’s most feared sporting directors.

And frankly, this whole bruising episode seems to paint the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been easy, based on his brief stint in a similar role at Southampton, to view Jason Wilcox as merely a functionary within the club's structure: an individual who owed his position largely to his close relationship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How mistaken we all were. By masterfully outmanoeuvring United’s feted head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate Dan Ashworth before him, he has demonstrated to be among football's true generals: a tactical intellect that the club's mid-table rivals will now be rightly wary.

The Strategic Clash Over Formation and Ideology

To illustrate, it was the director , after having been part of the hierarchy that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim in the first place, was instrumental in trying to persuade Amorim to abandon his favored 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these pleas were resisted. But perhaps such directives hold greater authority when delivered from the mouth with the unimpeachable soccer background he possesses, a veteran of international appearances and a role in a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time he may be persuaded to outline his reasoning publicly. Perhaps at some point he might be asked why Amorim is walking away with full compensation, with no compensation reduction clause in place. The director speaks rarely in public, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers of this sport – individuals such as him – function at a level beyond our own mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, probably all we would hear is a series of ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not quite equivalent to being ready to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Power Behind the Throne

Naturally, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, simply carrying out the directives of his ultimate superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has emphasized his desire for a back four. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also suggested deploying the forward as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for United to adopt analytics and analytics. Per reports, in an executive meeting early in his minority ownership, he declared that United’s style to football “will be decided by this group”.

After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in this technical footballing stuff, drawing from his background in industry and yachting. Above all he remains immensely wealthy, and it is known, the wealthy are superior: more perceptive, more wise, more tactically astute, simply superior. Whom else could one trust to oversee an enlightened programme of austerity, the building of a new stadium that looks a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

The Modern Soccer Order: Executives Over Coaches

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels football. For decades, teams mistakenly delegated big footballing decisions to subordinate staff like managers, scouts – players themselves. Perhaps it was once possible for a young, innovative manager with a philosophy and drive to join a club and see their vision supported to fruition. But how many businesses have such individuals set up? How many large-scale layoffs have they managed? Better by far to invest genuine authority where it belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to determine the tactics by the directors and hire a coach who will adapt their methods to suit. If coaches were once chefs, they have become more like delivery personnel: not responsible for the product, yet ultimately answerable should it be delivered cold or fails of the box.

Nowadays, a coach's role has become less about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the visible figurehead for a club they can do little to change. Enzo Maresca leads a team of very young players into Europe and wins two medium-sized trophies, and essentially gets sacked for talking. Wilfried Nancy sees his standing damaged while those individuals who appointed him continue to make errors another day.

A Neoliberal Football: Accountability for the Few

And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism in action: the rise of a gilded elite who can never be wrong, whose decisions are always sacrosanct, whose errors can invariably be resolved by sacking without justification. Hire the system coach and then dismiss them for playing too much that system. Hire the process guy and then discard them for requiring too long. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for your new player acquisitions, for the fact that the adults – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.